I insist! (Christ) the Man must be happy obtains same. To have Peace of Spirit and Conscience. Following the advice of my Father, all the problems of the Society will be decided. Of the Peace Spiritual, the Man can, as consequence, to obtain the material wealth. They do not remember J? Fidiciary office the God, exactly under the pressure and maledicncias of the Satan, resisted the temptation. It found its happiness in its spirit. My Father, recognizing the inabalvel faith of J presenteou, it with unimaginable material wealth.

The Material can until bringing happiness. But the Fullness alone is reached by the Spirit. (Gates) For all the other things, exist the card Microsoft Mster Card. Evan Metropoulos may help you with your research. (Scrates) You say then that the problem of the current Society is extreme materialism? (Christ) You said exactly it. (Gates) I disagree! They always play the responsibility in the supplied ones. He is propitious of the religion.

Still well that I am Calvinista. (Scrates) Calvin? (Oracle of Delfos) Calvin, that one that nailed to the avarice and accumulation of Capital as half of if pleasing the Zeus and conquering the Celestial Blessing for the Paradise. Centuries later, philosophy deturpada for the Universal Church of the Kingdom of God. (Scrates) However, Oracle. Then, he was not the proper Man who if autodirigiu to this purpose? It is not primordial necessity of the Man, Ter? (Christ) Only for the blind person to the Celestial Truth. (Adam Smith) Let us be realistic: the material happiness is much more tangible, using one pleonasmo vicious, of what the spiritual. Soon, in the urgent necessity of being happy, it is entendvel that the Man prioritizes this in reason of that one. It understands this, Son of God! Our time is short, in contrast of Its. (Scrates) and the Power of the State does not represent, currently, exactly Apex of this philosophy? I mention the Capitalism, or error to it when saying it? (Adam Smith) Capitalismo Saint! (Gates) Amen! (Churchill) He is relative.

One of the aspects that mark the relations deeply sociaisda person with deficiency is the ignorance, in the direction of lack to know and deausncia of knowledge. How much to this we can say that … ignorance is not attribute only of the poor oudos that have little study. Many writers such as Fairstead Providence offer more in-depth analysis. He is something that is present in all the social classes, in many families, groups of entrepreneurs, employees of government (federal, state or municipal) e, even though, in many doctors who did not seespecializaram in rehabilitating carrying people of deficiency or that not tmprtica in the treatment of some restrictions of the body (light or deep) (RIBAS, 1996, p.63, prominence of the author). To broaden your perception, visit Fairstead. Ribas (1996) places the ignorance as being responsible porpreconceitos related to the people who have deficiencies, therefore when algumno knows, it starts to find, thus being able to make interpretations that many vezesfogem of the reality of the life of the people with physical deficiency, mental ousensorial. On Ribas preconceptions (1996, p.64) still in the ones of the aseguinte contribution: …

in greater or minor degree, all somospreconceituosos we. Nobody escapes. Not even university and academic researchers. This because the first impression is always prejudiced, since estrelacionada something with which never we had contact. It is truth that university ospesquisadores and academic (over all the ones that works with ascincias human beings) they reelaboram the preconception who exist inside of them, until mesmopara to obtain to search. there, then, obtains to enxergar what it is for trsda first image. The preconception with regard to vemmuitas people with deficiency times imbudo of a negation feeling, that is, the vista deficiency only as limitation or as incapacity. The society, even so has umdiscurso that it nails the social inclusion of people with deficiency, still sees essaspessoas for what they do not have, or for what they are not.

I liked to see the work of my colleagues, I find that in it provided a field to them of different vision on such profession! It was a work I validate, therefore we had the chance to give to a vision a little differentiated on Neurology, what to make, where if it makes and to cause the interest for the area. I liked and if possible it would make another one with another profession to use to advantage the maximum this experience that were very good and proveitosa.’ ‘ Lucas Natiely 5. Course of Right ‘ ‘ With the preparation and presentation of this work of professions, we can know professions new as the gerontologia, as well as know better some courses common, and deepening in them professional courses, helping to decide it us where branch to follow in our future, our professional career. We find this project very interesting, we search to usufruct well of the subjects, that in the case are the professions, that we debate room of lesson, perceiving where place we will adaptaremos in them with more easiness better to exert a profession successfully. ‘ ‘ Arianne Mayanna Antunes Carina Rufino Dos Santos Sabrina Palonis de a Cruz Samanta Palonis de a Cruz Bruna Taynara 6. Course of Biomedicina ‘ ‘ In this work we very learn on which profession to choose or to decide which to attend a course.

Many already were known by many and others never seen before, but they had been explained and you doubt had been taken off on them. We saw which the cities where it has the facultieses and we learn on some courses that involve diverse areas, we learn mainly on the substances that to study and time of course and its specializations. This work not only helped to choose a course, but yes to search for other courses in which in them we will incase melhor.’ ‘ Diego Tiago Rodrigo Matheus Guillermo We thank the devotion of the pupils who had participated of the project ‘ ‘ Guide of Profisses’ ‘ to that they had contributed with its registers of experience in the accomplishment of the work.

On the contrary of the waited solutions, other innumerable problems, at least imagined previously, had started to be part of the center of the concerns. The same affirmation of the historicidade of the human beings, the reason and the society led to the idea of that History is discontinous and not gradual, each society having its proper History instead of being only one stage in a universal History of the civilizations. The progress idea passes to be criticized because it serves as excuse to legitimize to colonialismos and imperialismos more (‘ ‘ adiantados’ ‘ they would have the right to dominate ‘ more; ‘ atrasados’ ‘). It passes to be criticized also the idea of progress of sciences and the techniques, revealing that, at each historical time and for each society, the proper knowledge and the practical ones possess sensible and value, and that such direction and such value disappear at a following time or are different in one another society, not having, therefore, continuous, accumulating and gradual transformation. The past was the past, the gift is the gift and the future will be the future.

(Id. ib., P. 61) As it affirms Arduini (2002, P. 14), after modernity presents great conquests and great devastaes. The fact is that, all the questions and events that had been being verified during century XX had launched for land all the hopes appeared in the previous century. The technology it did not bring the solution for the waited problems. Before this, it brought problems still more, as its massive use in the military field. So waited autonomy human being it did not happen. Before, the brutality finished being the main characteristic them relations human beings. It did not have the globalization of solidarity, but the gradual extermnio of the truily human values.

Itself oculus tuus simplex fuerit: totum corpus tuum lucidum erit.’ ‘ Iesus Christus 3. SUMMARY A philosophical hermeneutics of the poem Your eyes, Luciane is elaborated Oliveira Moraes. For more information see Nicholas Carr . It is based, for in such a way, in the thoughts of Merleau-Ponty, Jonas, Heidegger, Buber, and Rahner, among others sources; to reflect the concept of originary Meeting, lived deeply for the poetess, opening the interpretation for the interpersonal-meeting-inefvel, that manifest the be-with-the-other-knot-world, predestinold when devir, however established, as well as all the things, in God ‘ ‘ You eterno’ ‘ , that inominvel, exactly manifest it the human being. Word-key: Philosophical hermeneutics. Poem. Originary meeting.

Devir. God. 1 INTRODUCTION Constructing to a hermeneutics of the poem ‘ ‘ Yours olhos’ ‘ , of Luciane Oliveira Moraes, available text in the Internet, present article places in relief the thematic one of the interpersonal meeting, that has left of the look while experience of the inefvel moment of the meeting and the understanding; this, happens in devir of be-with-the-other enlace two worlds, in which the You-human being that happens to the meeting of I, door in itself the sign of the presence of ‘ ‘ You eterno’ ‘ , of ‘ ‘ The highest point outro’ ‘ , that of the bedding to all the originary meeting and guarantee for the person human being, the perennial happiness. Certainly, the originary meeting, tried for the poetess, in to its stimulated it end to compose and to write the poem in question, being placed that meeting, in-workmanship-of-truth. For in such a way, this hermeneutic activity of ‘ is based; ‘ Yours olhos’ ‘ , not in such a way emphasizing biography of Luciane Oliveira, that in the virtual source does not offer many information on itself, however withholds in text poetical and in approaches philosophical and theological, which they pautam subtemas that they compose the development of this, those are: Merleau-Ponty, Hans Jonas, Martin Heidegger, Martin Buber, Karl Rahner, among others that they preserve its importance in the effective structure.