This is the shout, predominant, that it resounds enters the pupils of average level when inquired on what they think of it disciplines of literature in the public net of the city of Groaras. Observing the commentaries of some pupils it is perceived as soon as it has something of very serious, controversial and controversial. What it is not in in agreement ones, and possibly causing little the case on the part of educating? It is proper literature in itself, or will be the way as it is being worked in classroom, in this city? literature, as some searched tell, are decoration! Estarrecedora conception. Soon one sees that the pupils ‘ ‘ odeiam’ ‘ a thing that they nor know, a time that presents maken a mistake definition of literature total. Ahead of this situation, it is pertinent to make a brief story on what it is in fact literature. We do not have, therefore, to be ingenuous the point to believe that this investigation has an objective and easy definition. Even though the great literary theoreticians they divergem sufficiently on this question.
As Terry Eagleton: Literature asks for not a definition, but an analysis, even though a quarrel on why somebody it could, after all, if to worry about it. … the literature workmanships come in all the formats and sizes and the majority of them seems to have more in common with workmanships that generally are not called literature of what with some other recognized workmanships as literature. (P. 28). In this context we can, humblly, only consider that literature does not have nothing of soul with decoration. For the opposite, it says respect to the study of a pleasant reading, extremely interpretativa and intertextualizada.