Editors must make a decision on acceptance or rejection of materials in the publication solely on the basis of their relevance, originality, clarity and relevance of the research topic towards the magazine. 2. It should be particularly positive attitude to studies that challenged articles previously published in this journal. 3. You can not reject research materials, which yielded negative results. 4.
All original articles must pass a preliminary independent review, and should take all possible systematic errors due to coincidence or a conflict of interest. 5. When working with any materials submitted to the journal should respect confidentiality. 6. If the published article found serious flaws, editors must as soon as possible to publish corrections and bring the matter to the attention of readers in an appropriate explanation. 9.
The relationship with the means Media General media, including newspapers, magazines, television, radio and Internet news agencies have shown a growing interest in research in the field of medicine. Journalists can attend a variety of scientific meetings at which speakers are the preliminary results of their work, in connection with which the media often appear premature reports of ongoing studies. Practical steps 1. The authors, which asked for an explanation or interview representatives of the media should give a weighted description of his work, pointing out where the facts end and begin assumptions. 2. It is desirable to simultaneously publish research reports in peer-reviewed journal and the media. This practice usually indicates that you have received enough evidence able to dispel doubts about the most informed and critical readers.